您现在的位置:建筑结构>> 期 刊>> 2013年>> 第16期>>正文内容
超高层建筑全钢结构与钢-混结构方案弹塑性分析比较
许秀珍1,郑良知1,崔鸿超1,张铜生2
摘 要
许秀珍1,郑良知1,崔鸿超1,张铜生2
(1 上海中巍结构设计事务所有限公司, 上海 200135; 2 清华大学土木工程学院, 北京 100084)
 
[摘要]采用HBTA和ETABS软件对重庆万豪国际会展中心两种结构方案(框架-支撑全钢结构与钢-混结构)分别进行弹塑性分析,并对分析结果进行对比。通过弹性时程分析、静力弹塑性和弹塑性时程分析,对两种方案的弹性和弹塑性性能进行研究。结果表明,两种结构方案均能满足我国《建筑抗震设计规范》(GB 50011—2001)中“小震不坏、中震可修、大震不倒”的设防目标。同时对两种结构形式的抗震性能进行了比较。
[关键词]超高层; 全钢结构; 钢-混结构; 弹塑性分析
中图分类号:TU973.1+3, TU973.1+4文献标识码:A文章编号:1002-848X(2013)16-0015-05
 
Comparison of elastic-plastic analysis between hybrid structure and steel structure of a super-tall building
Xu Xiuzhen1, Zheng Liangzhi1, Cui Hongchao1, Zhang Tongsheng2
 (1 China Majesty Structure Design Office Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200135, China;  2 College of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)
 
Abstract: Elastic-plastic analysis of hybrid structure and steel structure of Chongqing Marriott International Conference Center tower was carried out by HBTA and ETABS. By elastic time-history analysis, Pushover analysis and elastic-plastic time-history analysis, elastic and elastic-plastic properties of two structures were investigated. Results show that both of two structures can satisfy Code for seismic design of buildings(GB 50011—2001)of “not be damaged under frequent earthquake, can be repaired under fortification earthquake and not be collapsed under rare earthquake”. The seismic performance of two structures was also compared.
Keywords: super-tall building; steel structure; hybrid structure; elastic-plastic analysis
作者简介:许秀珍,高级工程师,一级注册结构工程师,Email:chnmaje@163.com。
下载地址

    你还没注册?或者没有登录?这篇论文要求至少是本站的注册会员才能阅读!

    如果你还没注册,请赶紧点此注册吧!

    如果你已经注册但还没登录,请赶紧点此登录吧!