您现在的位置:建筑结构>> 期 刊>> 2012年>> 第12期>>正文内容
兴教寺玄焋塔抗震性能评估与加固*
卢俊龙1,张荫2,田洁1
摘 要
卢俊龙1,张荫2,田洁1
(1 西安理工大学土木建筑工程学院, 西安 710048; 2 西安建筑科技大学土木工程学院,西安 710055)
 
[摘要] 为了研究兴教寺玄焋塔的抗震性能,结合已有砖石古塔抗震性能评估方法,建立砖石古塔抗震性能综合评估模型,参考汶川地震中砖石古塔震害结果,确定评估模型中各参数的取值标准。并由考虑土与结构相互作用时砖石古塔的地震反应分析结果,对玄焋塔结构抗震性能进行了评估。评估结果表明:塔体底部、塔身沿竖直方向中轴线、塔檐及塔刹处存在薄弱环节,抗震能力不足,易发生破坏,可采用锚杆或抗滑桩加固地基、底部压力灌浆、各层钢板加箍的抗震加固方案。
[关键词] 砖石古塔;抗震性能评估;地震反应分析
中图分类号:TU362, TU746-3     文献标识码:A     文章编号:1002-848X(2012)12-0098-04
 
Strengthen and evaluation of seismic performance of Xuanzang Tower in Xingjiao Temple
Lu Junlong1, Zhang Yin2, Tian Jie1
(1 School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Xi′an University of Technology, Xi′an 710048, China; 2 School of Civil Engineering, Xi′an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi′an 710055, China)
 
Abstract: In order to study the seismic performance and strengthen method of Xuanzhuang Tower of Xingjiao Temple, in light of seismic performance evaluation method to masonry pagodas, the seismic performance integration evaluation model was set up. The seismic disaster of masonry pagodas in Wenchuan earthquake was referenced, the value standard in the evaluation model was confirmed. And according to seismic response analysis results when soil-structure interaction was considered, the seismic performance of Xuanzhuang Tower was evaluated. The related results indicate that the unsubstantial point lies in the bottom, the vertical axial line, the eave and the top of the tower, where the seismic strength is not adequate and is prone to be destroyed. The subsoil strengthened by anchor or anti-slide pile, grouting injected in the bottom, steel plate hooped in each floor can be adopted to strengthen the tower.
Keywords: masonry pagoda; evaluation of seismic performance; seismic response analysis
*国家自然科学基金项目(51178385,51078310),科技部科技行动计划项目([建科][2001]第002号(2001-2005))。
作者简介:卢俊龙,博士,讲师,Email:lujunlong@sohu.com
 
参考文献
[1]沈治国.砖石古塔的力学性能及鉴定与加固方法的研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2005.
[2]郭惠勇,李正良,彭川.结构损伤动力识别技术的研究与进展[J]. 重庆建筑大学学报,2008,30(1):140-145.
[3]刘箴,唐岱新.砌体结构损伤状态的评估[J]. 哈尔滨建筑大学学报,1996,29(4):25-31.
[4]邓春燕.砖土拱城门结构的安全性分析及加固技术研究[D].南京:东南大学,2004.
[5]邱洪兴,蒋永生,曹双寅.古塔结构损伤的系统识别Ⅰ:理论[J]. 东南大学学报:自然科学版,2001,31(2):81-85.
[6]邱洪兴,蒋永生,曹双寅.古塔结构损伤的系统识别Ⅱ:应用[J]. 东南大学学报:自然科学版,2001,31(2):86-90.
[7]曹双寅,邱洪兴,李一平.古塔结构可靠性诊断的系统方法及应用[J].特种结构,1999,16(4):50-52.
[8]卢俊龙. 砖石古塔土-结构相互作用理论与应用研究[D]. 西安:西安建筑科技大学,2008.
[9]文立华,王尚文.陕西砖结构古塔抗震研究[J].考古与文物,1996(6):42-47.
[10]陈平,赵冬,姚谦峰.西安大雁塔抗震能力探讨[J].建筑结构学报,1999,20(1):46-49.
[11]陈平,赵冬,姚谦峰.西安小雁塔抗震能力探讨[J].西安建筑科技大学学报,1999,31(2):149-151.
[12]LU JUNLONG, ZHANG YIN, YAO QIANFENG. Analysis of seismic disaster of masonry pagodas[C]//Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering for Disaster Mitigation & Rehabilitation, Nanjing, 2008.
下载地址

    你还没注册?或者没有登录?这篇论文要求至少是本站的注册会员才能阅读!

    如果你还没注册,请赶紧点此注册吧!

    如果你已经注册但还没登录,请赶紧点此登录吧!