某超限高层框支剪力墙结构动力和静力弹塑性分析
- 摘 要
-
魏琏1，刘畅1，王森1，陈军2，姚永革2，何子文3（1 深圳市力鹏建筑结构设计事务所，深圳 518034; 2 广州瀚华建筑设计有限公司，广州 510655; 3 广州市万科房地产有限公司， 广州 510105）［摘要］以某超高层框支剪力墙结构为例，用三维弹塑性分析软件Perform 3D分别进行了弹塑性时程分析和静力弹塑性分析，将得到的整体反应结果和构件损伤情况进行了对比。结果表明，两种分析均揭示了结构弹塑性反应的基本特点，主要反应指标吻合较好。同时需要指出的是，静力弹塑性分析得到的底部破坏情况较时程分析的结果更为严重，而弹塑性时程分析结果则反映上部楼层的损伤程度更严重。［关键词］超限高层； 弹塑性时程分析； 静力弹塑性分析； 罕遇地震中图分类号：TU311.3，TU313.3文献标识码：A文章编号：1002848X(2012)11003104Inelastic time-history Pushover analysis on a shear-wall structure with staggered floorsWei Lian1, Liu Chang1, Wang Sen1, Chen Jun2, Yao Yongge2, He Ziwen3（1 Shenzhen LIPENG Building Structnce Design Associates, Shenzhen 518034, China; 2 Guangzhou Hanhua Archtects-Engineers Co. Ltd., Guangzhou 510655, China; 3 Guangzhou Vanke Real Estate Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510105, China）Abstract: Inelastic time-history Pushover analysis and static inelastic analysis are both method to calculate structural deformation under rare earthquakes, which have different assumption and would be used in specific conditions. Based on a frame support shear wall structure, both inelastic time history analysis and static inelastic analysis were used to study its seismic performance. Perform 3D software was used to build model and carry out analysis. The results show that basic characteristics of structural inelastic response could be concluded with those two analysis, some of the response values are quite consistent. While it needs to be pointed out those two analysis methods may get different damage distribution results.Keywords: high rise building; inelastic time history analysis; static inelastic analysis; seismic performance作者简介：魏琏，教授，Email:wl2002111@163.com。参考文献［1］ JGJ 3—2002 高层建筑混凝土结构技术规程［S］.北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2002.［2］ Perform3D user guide version4 ［M］.CSI.［3］ Perform component and element［M］. CSI.［4］ 魏琏，王森，王志远，等.静力弹塑性分析方法的修正及在抗震设计中的应用［J］.建筑结构，2006，36(11)：97\|102.［5］ 魏琏.建筑结构抗震设计［M］.北京：万国学术出版社，1991.
