王  宏¹，  魏雷涛²，  丁永君³
    （1 东北电力设计院，长春 130021；2 天津大学，天津 300072；3 天津大学建筑设计规划研究总院，天津 300072）

[摘要] 结合某实际框架．简体结构，运用静力弹塑性和弹塑性动力时程两种方法，通过对实际工程进行大震下的分析，比较了静力弹塑性方法与弹塑性动力时程方法的异同，指出静力弹塑性方法在框筒结构分析中存在的问题，归纳出静力弹塑性方法的优点与不足，并对于结构抗震性能进行了整体评估，得到的一系列结论可供设计人员参考。
[关键词] 静力弹塑性；弹塑性动力时程；大震；高层框筒
中图分类号：    文献标识码：A  文章编号：1002-848X(2011) Sl-0104-04

Application and analysis of static elastic-plastic method on the seismic design of high-rise frame-tube buildings
Wang Hong¹,  Wei Leitao²,  Ding Yongjun³
(1 Northeast Electric Power Design Institute, Changchun 130021, China; 2 Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 3 Tianjin University Architecture Design & Research Institute, Tianjin 300072, China)

Abstract: The difference between the static elastic-plastic analysis method and the elastic-plastic time-lustory analysis method was compared through the comparative analysis ofa real frame-tube structure under major earthquake. The problems of the elastic-plastic analyses method were pointed in the analysis of the frame-tube structures. The advantages and disadvantages of the elastic-plastic method were summarized. The seismic performance of the whole structures was evaluated. The results and conclusions can be referred by the structural design.
Keywords: static; elastic-plastic; elastic-plastic time-history; major earthquake; high-rise frame-tube