叶志雄，邱剑，王东峰

（中信建筑设计研究总院有限公司，武汉 430014）

 

［摘要］采用桥建合一形式的铁路客站框架承轨结构，其承轨梁一般有普通混凝土梁和预应力混凝土梁两种。分析比较铁路桥梁和建筑结构的异同点，对框架承轨结构的两种方案进行静力弹塑性分析，比较两种方案的抗震性能，结果表明，两种方案都具有很好的抗震性能，均能满足抗震设计规范的要求。比较两种方案的裂缝、长期徐变挠度、动挠度等计算结果。最后指出，预应力混凝土梁具有更好的抗裂和抗疲劳性能。

［关键词］桥建合一；框架承轨；预应力混凝土梁；静力弹塑性；抗震性能

中图分类号：TU375-4文献标识码：A文章编号：1002-848X(2012)09-0032-03

 

Ye Zhixiong, Qiu Jian, Wang Dongfeng

(CITIC General Institute of Architectural Design and Research Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430014, China)

 

Abstract: The rail-bearing beams of framework rail-bearing structure in railway station, which adopts the form of bridge-station combined structure, have two kinds of beams, including the ordinary concrete and prestressed concrete beam. The similarities and differences between railway bridge and building structure were compared, and two schemes of framework bearing rail structure were analyzed by Pushover. The seismic performance of two schemes was compared. The results show that the two schemes have good seismic performance, and can meet the requirements of the seismic design code. Then the crack, long term creep deflection and dynamic deflection of two schemes were compared too. Finally, it is pointed out that the prestressed concrete beams have the better resistance to cracking and fatigue performance.

Keywords: bridg-station combined structure; frame support rail; prestressed concrete beam; Pushover; seismic performance

作者简介：叶志雄，博士，高级工程师，Email：yesui5685@163.com。

 

［1］王凤元.预应力技术在高架车站结构设计中的应用［J］.铁道标准设计,2007,51(5):93-95.

［2］魏国才,司占军.预应力混凝土框架弹塑性地震反应分析［J］.低温建筑技术,2008,30(4):102-104.

［3］徐晓龙,高德志,桂满树,等.北京某超高层商住楼动力弹塑性时程分析［J］.建筑结构,2010,40(S1):80-83.

［4］文元,张颖,牟达,等.万达中心结构设计［J］.建筑结构,2012,42(2):85-88.

［5］焦振刚,陶学康.预应力混凝土结构的抗震性能及设计反应谱的探讨［J］.工程抗震,2000,22(3):19-26.

［6］王冬雁，李振宝，杭英，等.无粘结预应力筋抗震性能分析［J］.建筑结构学报,2010,29(S1):333-337.