周红梅，叶甲淳，谢忠良

（浙江省建筑设计研究院，杭州 310006）

 

［摘要］选择高度为118，150，177m的三个工程实例，分别采用钢筋混凝土框架-核心筒结构体系和混合框架-钢筋混凝土核心筒混合结构体系进行设计和计算，对两种结构体系进行了技术和经济两方面的对比和分析。探讨了两种结构体系随高度增加显现出的规律和经验。对比结果显示：混合结构体系的结构质量减小20%，风载效应增大10%，地震效应减小15%~25%，工程总造价增加10%~12%，有效使用面积和楼层净高度增加、施工速度更快、抗震性能好，综合而言，混合框架-核心筒结构体系具有一定优势。

［关键词］钢筋混凝土框架-核心筒；混合框架-核心筒；钢管混凝土柱；双重抗侧力体系； 技术和经济对比

中图分类号：TU 971文献标识码：A文章编号：1002-848X(2012)08-0073-05

 

Zhou Hongmei, Ye Jiachun, Xie Zhongliang

(Zhejiang Province Institute of Architectural Design and Research, Hangzhou 310006, China)

 

Abstract: Three construction projects in the height of 118m, 150m and 177m were designed and calculated on the basis of RC frame-core tube structure and SRC mixed frame-RC core tube structure. Comparison and analysis in the aspects of technology and economy to those two structure systems have been made, meanwhile the arising regular manners with the rising structural heights have been discussed. Comparing with RC structure systems, the results show that the weight of the SRC mixed structure decreased by 20%, the effect of wind loads increased by 10%, the effect of seismic load reduced by 15%~25%,the total project cost increased by 10%~12%. And also the effective using area and height is increased, the construction speed is faster, seismic performance is good. The SRC mixed frame-RC core tube structure has certain advantages.

Keywords: RC frame-core; SRC mixed frame-RC core; concrete-filled steel tubular column; dual horizontal force resisting system; technological and economic comparison

作者简介：周红梅，教授级高工，一级注册结构工程师，Email：853846497@qq.com。

 

［1］徐培福，傅学怡，王翠坤，等. 复杂高层建筑结构设计［M］. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2005.

［2］高立人，方鄂华，钱稼茹. 高层建筑结构概念设计［M］. 北京:中国计划出版社,2005.

［3］GB 50011—2010 建筑抗震设计规范［S］. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.

［4］JGJ 3—2010 高层建筑混凝土结构技术规程［S］. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2011.

［5］CECS 230：2008高层建筑钢混凝土混合结构设计规程［S］. 北京:中国计划出版社,2008.