陈凯¹, 孙海角², 何连华¹, 符龙彪¹, 武林¹

  （1 中国建筑科学研究院风工程研究中心，北京 100013; 2 华润（大连）有限公司，大连 116001）

 

［摘要］结合某高层建筑表面风压的试验测量，分别用峰值因子法和概率分析方法计算了建筑表面风压极值，对两种方法获得的结果进行了详细对比分析。证实对大多数区域而言，这两种方法可以获得大体相当的结果，但在局部区域存在较大差异，而这些区域恰恰是应当引起关注的风压较高的区域。通过分析差异产生的原因，总结出对于负压区域，由于各种流动现象造成压力脉动远远偏离高斯分布，使得峰值因子法失效，而本文给出的概率分析方法与概率分布形式无关，简便易行。

［关键词］极值风压；围护结构；峰值因子；高斯分布

中图分类号：TU312文献标识码：A文章编号：1002-848X(2012)07-0123-05

 

Chen Kai¹, Sun Haijiao², He Lianhua¹, Fu Longbiao¹, Wu Lin¹

(1 Wind Engineering Research Center, China Academy of Building Research, Beijing 100013, China;2 China Resource (Dalian) Co., Ltd., Dalian 116001, China)

 

Abstract: The extreme wind pressures acting on a high-rise building were obtained through peak factor method and probability distribution analysis. The comparison was carried out subsequently and it was concluded that the results were approximately equal except in some local regions. However, the wind pressure was relatively high in those local regions which should be focused on. The reason leading to the difference was that the pressure fluctuation in the flow separation region was significantly different from the Gaussian distribution and consequently invalidated the peak factor method. However, the probability distribution analysis used in the present work was independent of the probability distribution and easy to follow.

Keywords: extreme wind pressure; cladding structure; peak factor; Gaussian distribution

*国家自然科学基金面上项目(50878202)。

作者简介：陈凯，博士，副研究员，Email:chenk@pku.org.cn。

 

［1］陈基发-围护结构的风荷载［J］ 建筑科学, 2000, 16(6): 26-31.

［2］DAVENPORT A G. Gust loading factors［J］. Journal of the Structural Division, 1967, 93(3): 11-34.

［3］陈凯, 余永生, 贾丛贤. 傍山地区的强风场特性实测研究［J］. 流体力学实验与测量, 2003, 17(3): 18-22.

［4］孙瑛, 武岳, 林志兴, 等. 大跨屋盖结构风压脉动的非高斯特性［J］. 土木工程学报, 2007, 40(4): 1-5.

［5］全涌, 顾明, 陈斌, 等. 非高斯风压的极值计算方法［J］. 力学学报, 2010, 42(3): 560-566.

［6］张相庭. 结构风工程——理论、规范、实践［M］. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社，2006.