- 摘 要
-
熊健(中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司城地院结构所, 武汉 430063)
[摘要]研究了土体硬化模型(HS模型)与小应变土体硬化模型(HSS模型)的理论依据,并以偏压基坑的工程实例为基础,对比分析两种本构模型在基坑有限元计算中的适用性,得到HSS本构模型相对HS本构模型在偏压基坑有限元分析计算中与实际监测数据更接近的结论。
[关键词]本构模型; 偏压基坑; 土体硬化模型; 小应变土体硬化模型
中图分类号:TU443文献标识码:A文章编号:1002-848X(2012)01-0124-04
Contrast analysis of HS and HSS constitutive model applied in the numerical simulation of asymmetrically loaded deep excavation
Xiong Jian(The Department of Structure, Urban Construction Design Institute, China Rail Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430063, China)
Abstract:Based on an engineering example of asymmetrically loaded deep excavation, the theoretical foundations of constitutive models of HS and HSS were analyzed. The contrast analysis of HS and HSS constitutive model applied in the numerical simulation of asymmetrically loaded deep excavation was studied. It is found that the deformation of the numerical simulation by HSS constitutive model is more close to monitoring data.
Keywords:constitutive model; asymmetrically loaded deep excavation; hardening soil model; hardening soil model with small-strain stiffiness
作者简介:熊健,工程师, Email:xiongjian2003@163.com。
参考文献
[1]POTTS D M,ZDRAVKOVIC L.Finite element analysis in geotechnical engineering: application[M].London:Thomas Telford,2001.
[2]GRANDE L.Some aspects on sheet pile wall analysis[C]//SoilStructure Interaction,International Conference on Soil Structure Interaction in Urban Civil Engineering,Darmstadt,1998:193-211.
[3]ALPAN I. The geotechnical properties of soil[J]. EarthScience Reviews,1970,6(1):5-49.
[4]北京金土木软件技术有限公司.PLAXIS岩土工程软件使用指南[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2010.