(1 中国建筑西南设计研究院有限公司, 成都 610041; 2 浙江大学高性能结构研究所, 杭州 310058;3 杭州铁木辛柯建筑结构设计事务所有限公司, 杭州 311215)

摘要: 截面高宽比 h / b 大于 2. 0 的矩形钢管混凝土柱具有较好的外观优势,能避免室内出现凸柱现象,随着实际应用日渐增多,对其的研究也越发深入. 根据《隐式钢管混凝土结构技术规程》 (T/ CECS 951—2021)和《矩形钢管混凝土结构技术规程》(CECS 159:2004)两本规范给出的条文对构件的计算结果及构造要求进行了对比. 计算对比包括截面塑性发展能力、单向压弯荷载作用下的截面强度及单向压弯荷载作用下的平面内稳定承载力等三个方面. 计算结果将再与多组实际试验结果进行对比,根据两者计算偏差判断规范公式的合理性. 构造方面主要对比截面尺寸、长细比、宽厚比、轴压比及强柱弱梁验算公式和免除强柱弱梁验算的条件. 结果表明,相比于 CECS 159:2004,T/ CECS 951—2021 更接近实际试验结果,计算公式更合理,构造要求规定更全面.

关键词: 矩形钢管混凝土柱; 压弯承载力; 轴压比; 长细比; 宽厚比; 强柱弱梁

中图分类号:TU391 文献标志码:A 文章编号:1002-848X(2023)11-0149-07

DOI:10. 19701 / j. jzjg. LZ2208

Understanding and application of the Design method for steel structures and steel-concrete compositestructures—rectangular concrete-filled steel tube column

ZHOU Jia1, TONG Genshu2, FU Bo3, LIU Yifeng1, LI Changhong1, ZHANG Yue3

(1 China Southwest Architectural Design & Research Institute Co. , Ltd. , Chengdu 610041, China; 2 Instituteof High-performace Structures, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; 3 Hangzhou TongMSK ArchitecturalStructure Design Office Co. , Ltd. , Hangzhou 311215, China)

Abstract: The rectangular concrete-filled steel tube column with the height-width ratio h / b greater than 2. 0 has betterappearance advantages and can avoid the phenomenon of convex in the room. With the increasing of practical applications,the relevant research is getting deeper. The calculation results and construction requirements of components were comparedaccording to the provisions given in Technical specification for structures with deep concrete-filled steel tubular members (T/CECS 951—2021) and Technical specification for structures with concrete-filled rectangular steel tube members (CECS 159:2004). The calculation includes three aspects, which are the section plastic development capacity, the section strengthunder one-way compression and bending load, and in-plane stability bearing capacity under one-way compression andbending load. The calculation results will be compared with the actual test results and the rationality of the standard formulawill be judged according to the calculation deviation. In terms of structure, the comparison includes the section size,slenderness ratio, width-to-thickness ratio, axial compression ratio, and the calculation and exemption of strong columnsand weak beams. The results show that compared to CECS 159:2004, T/ CECS 951—2021 is closer to the actual testresults, the calculation formula is more reasonable, and the construction requirements are more comprehensive.

Keywords: rectangular concrete-filled steel tube column; compression-bending capacity; axial compression ratio;slenderness ratio; width-to-thickness ratio; strong column and weak beam

第一作者:周佳,硕士,高级工程师,一级注册结构工程师,主要从事钢结构、组合结构的设计研究,Email:83294306@ qq. com.

[引用本文] 周佳,童根树,付波,等. 《钢结构与钢-混凝土组合结构设计方法》的理解与应用———矩形钢管混凝土柱[J]. 建筑结构,2023,53(11):149-155. ZHOU Jia,TONG Genshu,FU Bo,et al. Understanding and application of theDesign method for steel structures and steel-concrete composite structures—rectangular concrete-filled steel tube column[ J].Building Structure,2023,53(11):149-155.