（1 华诚博远工程技术集团有限公司, 北京 100052； 2 北京华信今朝结构设计事务所有限公司, 北京 100036;3 中冶京诚工程技术有限公司, 北京 100176； 4 藤田技术研究中心,厚木 243-0125； 5 日本东京建筑研究所, 东京 197-0804）

［摘要］为了分析中日结构设计规范在钢结构设计中存在的不同，以一栋6层钢结构商业大楼为例，分别采用中日钢结构规范进行设计，研究了两种设计规范体系下钢结构的设计流程，对比了中日规范体系下结构的地震作用、结构整体性能指标、构件的性能指标、节点的连接性能以及大震作用下结构的破坏机制等。研究结果表明，中日钢结构规范在指导钢结构设计方面，存在一定的差异，针对不同的结构性能指标，具有各自的侧重点。

［关键词］中日规范； 钢结构； 设计流程； 破坏机制； 地震反应分析

中图分类号：TU398-9文献标识码：A文章编号：1002-848X(2019)01-0001-09

Comparison of steel frame structural design examples under Chinese and Japanese standards

Wang Lijun1, Lu Lijie2, Yu Haiqun3, Tan Jinpeng1, Zhao Liang3, Feng Demin4, Liu Longjun5

(1 Huachengboyuan Engineering Technology Group, Beijing 100052, China; 

2 Beijing Huaxin Current Structure Design Co.,  Ltd., Beijing  100036, China; 

3 Capital Engineering & Research Incorporation Ltd., Beijing 100176, China; 

4 Technology Department Division of Fujita，Atsugi 243-0125, Japan; 

5 Tokyo Institute of Architecture,  Tokyo 197-0804, Japan）

Abstract:In order to analyze the differences between Chinese and Japanese structural design standards in steel structural design, a 6-story steel structure commercial building was taken as an example. Chinese and Japanese steel structure design standards were used to design the steel structure respectively. The design processes of the steel structure under two standards were compared, as well as the seismic actions and  overall performance indices of the structure, the performance indices of the components, the connection performance of the nodes and the failure mechanisms of the structure under the rare earthquake. The research results show that there are certain differences in the design of steel structure under Chinese and Japanese steel structure standards, and they have their own emphases on different structural performance indicators.

Keywords:Chinese and Japanese standards; steel structure; design flow; failure mechanism; seismic response analysis

作者简介：王立军，博士，教授级高级工程师，Email: 15810384069@163.com。