- 摘 要
-
(1 中国地震局工程力学研究所, 中国地震局地震工程与工程振动重点实验室, 三河 065201; 2 北京羿射旭科技有限公司, 北京 100050)
[摘要]介绍剪力墙结构中的三种典型消能减震设计方案,分别为连梁型黏滞消能器方案、黏滞阻尼墙方案和采用增幅机构的黏滞消能器方案。对三种方案进行了多遇地震下的弹性时程分析和罕遇地震作用下的弹塑性时程分析,对比分析三种消能减震方案的减震效果。结果表明,三种方案均有较好的消能减震效果,采用增幅机构的黏滞消能器方案减震效果较好,但成本较高;黏滞阻尼墙方案造价较高,减震效果相对较差,但其对建筑功能的影响较小;连梁型黏滞消能器方案减震效果较好,造价较低,但其布置受到连梁高度的限制。
[关键词]剪力墙; 消能减震设计; 黏滞阻尼墙; 黏滞消能器
中图分类号:TU311-41文献标识码:A文章编号:1002-848X(2018)09-0019-04
Comparative analysis of three typical viscous dissipation design for shear wall structures
Zhang Yu1, Li Xin2, Zhang Licheng2
(1 Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, China Earthquake Administration, Sanhe 065201, China; 2 Beijing Yishexu Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100050, China)
Abstract:Three typical design schemes for energy dissipation in shear wall structure were introduced, including the connecting beam viscous damper scheme, the viscous damping wall scheme and the amplification mechanism viscous damper scheme. The elastic time-history analysis under the frequency earthquake and the elastic-plastic time-history analysis under the rare earthquake were done, and the damping effect of the three damping schemes was compared and analyzed. The results show that all three schemes have good energy dissipation and damping effect. The amplification mechanism viscous damper scheme shows better energy dissipation effect, while the cost is higher; the viscous damping wall scheme has a higher cost and relatively poorer damping effect, but its influence on building function is relatively smaller; the connecting beam viscous damper scheme has relatively better energy dissipation effect and lower cost, but its layout is limited by the height of the beam.
Keywords:shear wall structure; energy dissipation design; viscous damping wall; viscous damper
作者简介:张钰,博士研究生, Email:13811125353@126.com。