蒙皮板整体剪切屈曲性能试验及有限元分析
- 摘 要
-
(1 东南大学土木工程学院,南京 210096; 2 上海博壹建筑科技有限公司,上海 201206)[摘要]在蒙皮体的各种破坏形式中,整体剪切屈曲破坏是具有控制作用的破坏形式之一。对目前国内常用的YX20-166-830型压型钢板组成的6个不同边界连接的蒙皮板进行了抗剪试验研究,探讨边界连接形式对整体屈曲荷载的影响。在试验的基础上进行了有限元分析,将试验结果、有限元计算结果和理论结果进行了比较。屈曲荷载的试验值与有限元计算值相差较小,可见有限元计算模型可以作为进行蒙皮体抗剪性能分析的辅助手段。另外,通过屈曲荷载的试验值和简化公式值比较,得到了边界连接形式对整体屈曲荷载的影响,进一步完善了蒙皮板整体剪切屈曲的计算公式。[关键词]蒙皮板;整体剪切屈曲;连接形式;屈曲荷载;有限元分析Experiment and finite element analysis on overall shear buckling performance of stressed skin diaphragmsGuo Jing1, Shan Jian1, Yang Xiaodong2(1 College of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China; 2 Shanghai Boyi Construction Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201206, China)Abstract:Overall shear buckling is one of decisive failure modes of skin diaphragms. Experimental investigation in six skin diaphragms under shearing loading was carried out, in which the diaphragms are made of common YX20-166-830 profiled steel sheeting, with different boundary attachments. The influence of boundary condition on overall buckling strength is discussed. Based on experiment, finite element analysis is performed, the corresponding results are compared. Difference between experimental values and finite element values concerning overall buckling strength is little, and finite element models can be adopted as an accessorial method in analysis of the shear behavior of skin diaphragms. In addition, influences of boundary attachments on overall buckling strength are presented through comparisons between experimental values and simplified equation values concerning overall buckling strength, and the equation on overall shear buckling of skin diaphragms is supplied.Keywords:stressed skin diaphragms; overall shear buckling; modes of boundary attachment; buckling strength; FEA作者简介:郭静,博士研究生,Email:guojingsoutheast@163.com。参考文献[1]DAVIES J M, BRYAN E R. Manual of Stressed Skin Diaphragm Design[M]. London: Granada Publishing, 1982.[2]ECCS European Recommendations for the Application of Metal Sheeting Acting as a Diaphragm[S]. Brussels: European Convention for Constructional Steelwork, 1995.[3]AISI Design of Cold-Formed Steel Diaphragms(Draft)[S]. American Iron and Steel Institute, 1981.[4]British Standard 5959-9 Structural Use of Steelwork in BuildingPart 9: Code of Practice for Stressed Skin Design[S]. 1994.[5]林醒山, 柏树新. 国内外受力蒙皮研究发展概况[J]. 南京建筑工程学院学报,1992(2):43-49.[6]GB50018—2002冷弯薄壁型钢结构技术规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社,2002.[7]CECS102:2002门式刚架轻型房屋钢结构技术规程[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社,2002.[8]WRIGHT HOWARD D, HOSSAIN K M ANWAR. In-plain shear behavior of profiled steel sheeting[J]. Thin-walled Structures,1997, 29:79-100.[9]HOSSAIN K M ANWAR, WRIGHT H D. Experimental and theoretical behavior of composite walling under in-plain shear[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2004, 60:59-83.[10]ARTHUR H NILSON, ALBERT R AMMAR, Finite element analysis of metal deck shear diaphragms[J]. Journal of Structural Division, ASCE, 1974,100(4):711-725.[11]完海鹰,王梅,曾荻. 考虑蒙皮效应的高层结构有限元分析[J].合肥工业大学学报,2001,24(2): 184-188.[12]刘洋. 轻钢结构蒙皮效应的理论与试验研究[D]. 上海:同济大学,2006.[13]陈娟婷. 金属蒙皮连接抗剪性能的分析研究[D]. 南京:东南大学,2006.[14]刘志凌. 冷成型钢住宅结构的蒙皮效应研究[D]. 南京:东南大学,2008.[