- 摘 要
-
(1 同济大学土木工程防灾国家重点实验室,上海 200092;2 同济大学土木工程学院建筑工程系,上海 200092;3 中国建筑设计研究院,北京 100044)
[摘要]依据不同设计准则分别采用国产热轧Q235B,BLY225两种钢材设计了三种截面形式的TJ型屈曲约束支撑构件。通过低周往复加载试验,研究了该类构件的滞回曲线、骨架曲线、累计塑性应变、附加等效阻尼比以及支撑核心区相对长度对其抗震性能的影响。试验结果表明,该类型屈曲约束支撑滞回曲线饱满,具有稳定的受力特性和优良的延性及低周疲劳性能。根据试验构件的滞回曲线提出了基于Bouc-Wen模型的修正滞回模型,该模型的拟合滞回曲线与试验结果吻合较好。
[关键词]屈曲约束支撑; 低周往复荷载; 屈服荷载; 累计塑性应变; 相对塑性区长度; 拉压不对称
中图分类号:TU352.1 文献标识码:A 文章编号:1002-848X(2014)18-0071-08
Experimental study on the aseismic performance of buckling-restrained braces
Li Guoqiang1,2, Sun Feifei1,2, Deng Zhongliang3, Guo Xiaokang2, Jin Huajian2
(1 State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2 Building Department, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3 China Architectural Design & Research Group, Beijing 100044, China)
Abstract: Based on diverse design principles, three different sections of TJ type buckling-restrained braces(TJ-BRB) were designed with domestic hot-rolled Q235B and BLY225 steel materials. Through low-cyclic loading experiments, the influences of respective hysteresis curves, skeleton curves, the cumulating plastic strain, additional equivalent damping ratio and relative length of the brace core on its anti-seismic property were studied. The experimental analysis showes that TJ-BRB has steady mechanical property, excellent ductility and low-cyclic fatigue property with considerable full hysteresis curves. Furthermore, according to hysteresis curves of experiment member, modified hysteresis model based on Bouc-Wen model was proposed, which matched well with the experimental results.
Keywords: buckling-restrained brace; low-cyclic loading; yielding load; cumulating plastic strain; relative length of the plastic core; asymmetrical property of tension and compression
*国家科技支撑计划资助(2012BAJ13B02)。
作者简介:李国强,教授,博士生导师,Email: gqli@tongji.edu.cn。
参考文献
[1]汪家铭,中岛正爱,陆烨. 屈曲约束支撑体系的应用与研究进展(Ⅰ)[J]. 建筑钢结构进展, 2005, 7(1):1-12.
[2]郭彦林,刘建彬,蔡益燕,等. 结构的耗能减震与防屈曲支撑[J]. 建筑结构,2005, 35(8):18-23.
[3]赵俊贤,吴斌,欧进萍. 新型全钢防屈曲支撑的拟静力滞回性能试验[J]. 土木工程学报,2011,44(4):60-70.
[4]邓雪松, 邹征敏, 周云, 等. 开槽式三重钢管防屈曲耗能支撑试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2011, 44(7): 37-45.
[5]罗开海,孔祥雄,程绍革. 一种新型屈曲约束支撑的研制与试验研究[J]. 建筑结构,2010,40(10): 1-6.
[6]CAMERON J BLACK, NICOS MAKRIS, IAN D AIKEN. Component testing seismic evaluation and characterization of buckling-restrained braces[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2004, 130(6):880-894.
[7]李国强,孙飞飞,陈素文,等. 大吨位国产TJⅡ型屈曲约束支撑的研制与试验研究[J]. 建筑钢结构进展,2009, 11(4):22-26.
[8]罗开海,程绍革,白雪霜,等. 屈曲约束耗能支撑力学性能分析[J]. 工程抗震与加固改造,2007,29(2): 23-32.
[9]汪大绥,陈建兴,包联进,等. 耗能减震支撑体系研究及其在世博中心工程中的应用[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2010, 31(5):117-123.
[10]孙飞飞,张葳,李立树. 框架-防屈曲开缝钢板墙体系设计方法的比较研究[J]. 建筑钢结构进展,2012,14(5):44-52.
[11]李国强,胡宝琳,孙飞飞. TJ-Ⅰ型屈曲约束支撑研制与试验研究[C]//第十一届高层建筑抗震技术交流会论文集. 昆明, 2007.
[12]GB 50011—2010 建筑抗震设计规范[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
[13]上海市金属结构协会,同济大学多高层钢结构与钢结构抗火研究室.TJ型屈曲约束支撑设计手册[M].2009.
[14]ANSI/AISC 341-05 Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings[S]. AISC, 1997.
[15]BOUC R. Forced vibration of mechanical systems with hysteresis[C]//The 4th International Conference on Nonlinear Oscillation. Prague,1967:315-320.
[16]WEN Y K. Method of random vibration of hysteretic systems[J].Journal of Engineering mechanics,1976(102):249-63.
[17]李国强, 胡宝琳. 屈曲约束支撑曲线滞回模型和刚度方程的建立[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2007, 27 (2): 26-31.