(河北北方绿野建筑设计有限公司， 石家庄 050011)

［摘要］结合某一实际工程，在大致相同的场地条件下，对基桩采用锚桩法、反力桩法与自平衡法进行试桩测试。通过对试桩测试结果进行对比分析，验证了在实际工程中采用自平衡法试桩结果的可靠性及准确性，提出可将自平衡法实测值乘以修正系数0.9的建议。同时通过对桩侧埋设的钢筋计所测得出的桩侧阻力进行分析，得出自平衡法和反力桩法两种不同试桩方式间的受力差异关系。

［关键词］锚桩法; 反力桩法; 自平衡法; 试桩; 对比分析

中图分类号：TU471.3+6      文献标识码：A      文章编号：1002-848X(2014)16-0087-04

Comparative analysis on results of test piles by anchor pile method, reaction force pile method and self balance pile method

Zhang Lixin, Yi Kefeng, Li Wei, Ma Yuguang, Li Yong

 (Hebei N. Green Architectural Design Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang 050011, China)

Abstract: Combined with a real project, piles were tested by using the anchor pile method, reaction force pile method and self balanced pile method under roughly the same site conditions. Through the comparative analysis of the test results of piles, the accuracy and reliability of the results by self balanced pile method in practical engineering were verified, and the measured value by self balanced pile method was recommended to multiply the correction coefficient of 0.9. Through the analysis of the pile side resistance by using the embedded reinforcement meter on the pile side, mechanical difference relationship can be obtained from two different test pile methods of self balanced pile method and reaction force pile method.

Keywords: anchor pile method; reaction force pile method; self balanced pile method; test pile; comparative analysis

作者简介：张利新，学士，正高级工程师，一级注册结构工程师，Email：zhlx3368@126.com。

参考文献

［1］张利新. 石家庄地区大直径后注浆灌注桩侧阻力及端阻力增强系数合理取值的试验研究［J］. 建筑结构，2014,44（1）：66-72.

［2］槐底村旧村改造二期工程地质勘查报告［R］. 石家庄:河北中核岩土工程有限责任公司，2012．

［3］JGJ 106—2003 建筑基桩检测技术规范［S］．北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2003.

［4］B-12-14 槐底村旧村改造二期试桩报告［R］. 石家庄:河北中核岩土工程有限责任公司，2012．

［5］龚维明，戴国亮. 桩承载力自平衡测试技术及工程应用［M］. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2006.