(交通运输部天津水运工程科学研究所水工构造物检测、诊断与加固技术交通行业重点实验室，天津 300456)

［摘要］对比分析了国内外6种无筋砌体结构材料的本构关系模型，指出了各个模型的优缺点。推荐了力学特性合理、工程应用性强的无筋砌体材料本构关系模型，并采用该本构关系模型进行了一个典型底商多层砌体结构弹塑性地震反应的计算分析。通过脉动测试，获得了底商砌体结构(震后)纵横向一阶固有频率和扭转频率，可作为有限元模型合理性判定的依据；弹塑性地震反应计算结果表明，该结构的纵向为薄弱方向，在9度大震的卧龙波作用下结构严重破坏。

［关键词］本构关系; 砌体结构; 弹塑性分析; 地震反应

中图分类号：TU317+.1        文献标识码：A        文章编号：1002-848X(2014)15-0083-05

Calculation method of elasto-plastic seismic response of multi-story masonry structure with first floor used as shops

Liu Hongbiao, Liu Xianpeng, Zhang Qiang, Han Yang

(Key Laboratory of Harbor & Marine Structure Safety, Ministry of Communications, Tianjin Research Institute of Water Transport Engineering, Tianjin 300456, China)

Abstract: Six kinds of constitutive relation models of unreinforced masonry structure were compared and analyzed at home abroad, and the advantages and disadvantages of each model were pointed out. The constitutive relation model of unreinforced masonry structure which is reasonable in mechanical characteristics and excellent in engineering application was proposed, and it is used to calculate and analysis the elasto-plastic seismic response of typical masonry structure with first story used as shops. The first order natural frequency and torsional frequency of the structure were acquired with pulsation measurement, which can be used as the basis for judging the rationality of the finite element model. The elasto-plastic seismic response of the typical masonry structure shows that the stiffness of longitudinal direction of the structure is weaker than the others, and the structure badly damaged under the Wolong 9 degree earthquake.

Keywords: constitutive relation; masonry structure; elasto-plastic analysis; seismic response

*国家自然科学基金项目（51308517），交通运输部天津水运工程科学研究所基本科研项目（TKS140101)。

作者简介：刘红彪，博士，工程师，Email：liuhbhit@hotmail.com。

参考文献

［1］BRUNEAU M. State-of-the-art report on seismic performance of unreinforced masonry building［J］. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 1994, 120(1): 230-551.

［2］MERGURO K, HAKUNO M. Fracture analysis of concrete structures by modified distinct element method［J］. Structural Engineering and Earthquake Engineering, 1989, 6(2): 283-284.

［3］GAMBAROTTA L, LAGOMARSINO S. Damage models for the seismic response of brick masonry shear wall, Part Ι: the mortar joint model and its applications［J］. Earthquake Engineering and Structure Dynamics, 1997, 26（4）:423-439.

［4］GAMBAROTTA L, LAGOMARSINO S. Damage models for the seismic response of brick masonry shear wall, PartⅡ: the continuum model and its applications［J］. Earthquake Engineering and Structure Dynamics, 1997, 26（4）:441-462.

［5］DORN M. Computer prediction of the damage to and collapse of complex masonry structures from explosions［J］. Structurs and Materials, 2000, 8(4): 227-286.

［6］苗吉军，顾祥林，张伟平, 等．地震作用下砌体结构倒塌反应的数值模拟计算分析［J］．土木工程学报，2005，38(9)：45-52．

［7］TURSEK V, AOVI F. Some experimental results on the strength of brick masonry walls［C］//Proceedings of the International Brick-Masonry Conference. British Ceramic Society, U.K.:Stoke-on Trent, 1971:149-156.

［8］POWELL B, HODGKINSON H R. Determination of stress-strain relationship of brickwork［M］. Refractories Division, British Ceramic Research Assoc., 1976, 136-149.

［9］施楚贤．砌体结构理论与设计［M］．2版.北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2003．

［10］庄一舟．模型砖砌体力学性能的试验研究［J］．建筑结构，1997，27(2)：22-25．

［11］刘桂秋．砌体结构基本受力性能的研究［D］．长沙：湖南大学，2005．

［12］AUGENTI N, PARISI F. Constitutive models for tuff masonry under uniaxial compression［J］. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2010, 22(11):1102-1111.

［13］刘红彪，郭迅. 9度设防区场地脉动测试分析［J］. 地震工程与工程振动, 2011, 31(6): 8-13.

［14］刘红彪，郭迅. 极震区典型砌体结构的振动台倒塌对比试验分析［J］. 土木工程学报, 2012, 31(6): 18-28.

［15］周宝峰，于海英，温瑞智, 等. 一种识别永久位移的新方法［J］. 土木工程学报, 2013, 46(S2): 135-140.