（西安建筑科技大学土木工程学院， 西安 710055）

［摘要］利用Shear Trac-Ⅲ大型直剪仪对松砂-混凝土接触面进行了常/变法向应力作用下的剪切试验，分析了剪切过程中剪应力和剪切面体应变的变化特征，建立了能够反映松砂-混凝土接触面剪切力学性状的数学模型，并给出了模型参数的确定方法。试验结果表明：在常法向应力作用下的剪切试验中，松砂-混凝土接触面的剪应力及体应变与法向应力密切相关；在变法向应力作用下的剪切试验中，松砂-混凝土接触面的抗剪强度与相应的常法向应力的抗剪强度相同，但其体应变小于相应的常法向应力作用下的体应变；在常法向应力作用下，松砂-混凝土接触面的剪应力-剪切位移关系可以用双曲线模型表示；在变法向应力作用下，松砂-混凝土接触面的剪应力-剪切位移关系可以用分段双曲线模型表示。

［关键词］常法向应力; 变法向应力; 松砂-混凝土接触面; 剪切性状; 大型剪切试验; 数学模型

中图分类号：TU43,TU411      文献标识码：A      文章编号：1002-848X(2014)08-0061-05

Experimental research on shear properties of loose sand-concrete interface under constant/varying normal stress

Liang Peng, Cao Weiping, Lu Qingyuan

（College of Civil Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China）

Abstract: A series of  shear tests of loose sand-concrete interface under constant/varying normal stress were carried out by using Shear Trac-Ⅲ large direct shear apparatus. The characteristics of shear stress and volumetric strain were analyzed, and some mathematical models were developed to reflect the shear mechanical properties of loose sand-concrete interface. In addition, the determine method of model parameters was provided. It is concluded that the shear strength and the volumetric strain of loose sand-concrete interface are closely related to the normal stress in the constant normal stress-shear tests. In the varying normal stress-shear tests, the shear strength is identical to that of the constant normal stress, but the volumetric strain is smaller. Based on the test data, the relationship between the shear stress and the shear displacement under the constant normal stress can be fitted with the hyperbolic curve; and the relation between them under the varying normal stress can be fitted with the piecewise hyperbolic curve.

Keywords: constant normal stress; varying normal stress; loose sand-concrete interface; shear property; large-scale  shear test; mathematical model

*国家自然科学基金(51078308)。

作者简介：梁鹏，硕士研究生，Email: laparch@126.com。

参考文献

［1］殷宗泽，朱弘，许国华. 土与结构材料接触面的变形及其数学模拟［J］. 岩土工程学报，1994，16(3)：14-22.

［2］王伟，卢廷浩，宰金珉，等. 土与混凝土接触面反向剪切单剪试验［J］. 岩土力学，2009，30(5)：1303-1306.

［3］YOSHIMI Y, KISHIDA T. A ring torsion apparatus for evaluating friction between soil and metal surfaces［J］. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 1981, 4(4):145-152.

［4］UESUGI M, KISHIDA H. Influential factors of between steel and dry sands［J］. Soils and Foundations, 1986, 26(2)：33-46.

［5］谢定义，陈存礼，胡再强. 试验土工学［M］. 北京：高等教育出版社，2011.

［6］ALONSO E E，JOSA A, LEDESMA A. Negative skin friction on piles: a simplified analysis and prediction procedure［J］. Geotechnique,1984,34(3):341-357.

［7］LEE C J, BOLTON M D, AL TABBAA A. Numerical modelling of group effects on the distribution of dragloads in pile foundations［J］. Geotechnique,2002,52(5): 325-335.

［8］FELLENIUS B H. Results from long-term measurement in piles of drag load and downdrag［J］. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2006,43(4)：409-430.

［9］HIRAYAMA H. Load-settlement analysis for bored piles using hyperbolic transfer functions［J］. Soils and Foundations,1990,30(1):55-64.